July is here, and for many health care professionals that signals a special time of year: the entry of a new cohort of providers in training! Our Department of Family & Community Medicine and the Family Health Center at SFGH recently welcomed a new class of interns; as such, this month is a uniquely exciting and busy one. (As an aside, it’s only fitting these new department members will get to see many of their attending physicians in the learner role as our health center forges ahead with an epic transition to a new electronic health record – pun definitely intended…)
When initially approached to contribute an entry to the End HepC SF blog, it was easy enough to almost-reflexively request a deadline extension because of what was already looming on the horizon. But if I’m to be honest, I knew I also needed time to think through this issue. The reasons for this are many, but the short story is that I find HCV education and training for residents to be a challenge. It’s most definitely a good one to have, and by no means do I consider it a particularly major challenge relative to others, but – simply put—I’m not sure we are where we really want to be with resident education. At this point in time, many excellent educational resources are available online; these are well-organized, updated regularly, and designed to allow learners to digest information in a self-paced and interactive manner. This leaves me to wonder, then, what curricular material I’d consider to be of highest yield when I have an hour or two of prized face-to-face teaching time with residents? Further, many (including myself) believe that some of the most valuable learning experiences can arise when residents directly participate in HCV treatment decision-making and trouble-shooting with patients. How can a large residency program like ours ensure every resident has a critical mass of such experiences in order to guarantee ongoing interest in treating HCV, and – just as importantly—that their HCV-related skills-building becomes a self-sustaining process? Although our residency program has made great progress in a relatively short time, my sense is that untapped learning opportunities remain and we have yet to fully integrate HCV teaching and care throughout our program.
A few members of the Clinician Consultation Center’s HCV Warmline team
(L to R: Carolyn Chu, Janeen Rojas, Cristina Gruta, Marliese Warren
I’m extremely fortunate to be a clinician-educator here in San Francisco, surrounded by incredibly skilled and inspiring patients, colleagues, and learners. I’m even more fortunate to have differing and varied opportunities to exercise my clinician-educator muscles: outside of the Family Health Center, I have been involved with the national Hepatitis C Warmline, a free point-of-care tele-consultation/education service based at SFGH that can assist any health care provider who has questions about treating hepatitis C. Over the last year, our Warmline has grown by leaps and bounds— “on-demand” access to our consultant team has seemed to make a palpable difference for many callers, a number of whom might have been less-than-enthusiastic HCV champions when they started but who now find HCV care to be a uniquely rejuvenating part of their week. One thing I am most proud of is the clear value our Warmline offers, by being able to synthesize various guidelines, provide up-to-date evidence, and help busy providers identify realistic strategies to reconcile general clinical recommendations with their individual patients and practices. Our consultants certainly have had the benefit of being firsthand witnesses and contributors to HCV-related initiatives in San Francisco, but San Francisco’s models and processes of HCV outreach and treatment aren’t necessarily portable to a rural community in Alaska. One caller shared the following feedback: “I am so happy [the Warmline] is available to enable primary care providers to care for patients that otherwise would not get care or treatment for hepatitis C.” Testimonies such as these bring a lot of joy and meaning to our work.
As you can [hopefully] see from the above, if nothing else, my day to day environment is very much one of teaching and learning, and helping to support universal patient access to high-quality care. So, in the spirit of learning, I’d like to end with the thoughts below.
Things I am confident of:
Things that remain unresolved (at least, for me):
I’m hoping that the years ahead, and ongoing dialogue with other educators, will help provide some clarity on the above. Suggestions for how to become a master residency HCV educator are most welcome! Thank you to the End HepC SF team for this invitation to share lessons learned, and to spread the word about our Hepatitis C Warmline!!
*This is a personal reflection piece. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the University of California-San Francisco or City and County of San Francisco; nor does mention of the San Francisco Department of Public Health imply its endorsement.